Dogs and cats are among the most popular pets in the world. Millions of households share their lives with one or both of these animals.
People often say that pets are good for mental health and can bring comfort, happiness, and companionship. Yet scientists have continued to ask an important question: Why do pets make us feel better, and are cats and dogs equally helpful?
Researchers in the Netherlands recently carried out a study to investigate these questions. Their findings were published in Frontiers in Psychology. The study focused on the emotional effects of everyday interactions between people and their pets.
Scientists have known for many years that pet ownership is often linked with better emotional well-being. Some studies suggest that pet owners may experience less loneliness and greater life satisfaction. Pets can also encourage routines and provide companionship during difficult periods.
However, previous research has often relied on surveys that ask people to remember how they felt weeks or months earlier, which may not always be accurate.
To obtain a clearer picture, the researchers used a different approach. Volunteers in the study received ten notifications on their phones every day for five days. Every time the phone alerted them, participants answered questions about their current emotions, what they were doing, and whether they were with their pets or interacting with them.
This approach generated almost 8,000 reports about daily experiences. Because the information was collected in real time, the researchers could see how people’s emotions changed from one moment to another.
The results showed that pet interactions generally had positive effects. During times when owners spent more time interacting with their pets, they usually reported more pleasant emotions and fewer unpleasant ones. Surprisingly, the benefits were almost identical for cat owners and dog owners.
The findings challenge the common belief that one species may be better than the other when it comes to emotional health. According to the researchers, people may receive benefits because they often choose pets that suit their personalities and lifestyles.
Someone who enjoys active outdoor activities may prefer a dog, while someone who values quiet companionship may prefer a cat. Because owners often match well with their pets, both groups may experience similar emotional rewards.
The researchers then examined the idea that pets act as stress buffers. Many people believe that stroking a cat or playing with a dog can immediately reduce stress. However, the study found little evidence for this idea.
When participants felt stressed, interacting with their pets did not significantly weaken the connection between stress and negative emotions. In other words, people generally felt good when interacting with their pets, but those interactions did not appear to provide special protection during stressful moments.
One surprising finding involved cat owners. Higher levels of interaction with cats during stressful periods were sometimes linked with stronger negative emotions.
The researchers emphasized that there is currently no clear explanation for this result. They also pointed out that the sample of cat owners was relatively small and that the finding was not seen in every analysis.
Dog owners showed a different pattern. Interacting with dogs during stressful situations did not increase negative emotions, but it did not significantly decrease them either.
The researchers believe there may be other explanations for why pets improve emotional well-being. Pets may reduce feelings of loneliness, provide a sense of companionship, and create feelings of being needed and loved. These emotional experiences may slowly improve well-being over time rather than acting as immediate stress relievers.
The study has several advantages because it examined daily life in real time and included thousands of observations.
Nevertheless, there are also limitations. The study relied on self-reported emotions, involved a limited number of participants, and only covered a short period of time. Additional studies involving larger groups of people and longer observation periods are needed.
Overall, the findings suggest that both cats and dogs can positively influence emotional health. There is no convincing evidence that one species is universally better than the other. Instead, the benefits of pet ownership may depend on the unique relationship people build with their animals.
Review and analysis: The study provides valuable insight into how pets affect human emotions. It suggests that the emotional benefits of pets are genuine but may not come from immediate stress reduction. Instead, pets may support mental well-being by offering companionship and reducing feelings of isolation.
The findings also remind us that human-animal relationships are complex and highly individual, meaning that the best pet is likely the one that matches a person’s personality, needs, and lifestyle.
If you care about depression, please read studies that vegetarian diet may increase your depression risk, and Vitamin D could help reduce depression symptoms.
For more information about health, please see recent studies that ultra-processed foods may make you feel depressed, and these antioxidants could help reduce the risk of dementia.
Source: The Open University.
