Astronomers find surprising conflict between James Webb data and universe models

Simulation of galaxies ionizing hydrogen gas (bright areas) during the epoch of Reionization. Credit: M. Alvarez, R. Kaehler, and T. Abel / European Southern Observatory (ESO).

A new study using data from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has revealed surprising results that challenge long-standing ideas about how the universe evolved.

This discovery is causing astronomers to rethink the timeline of a critical period in cosmic history called reionization, which is when the first stars and galaxies dramatically changed the universe.

Reionization happened after the Big Bang, which took place around 13.8 billion years ago.

For the first 380,000 years, the universe was filled with a hot, dense plasma of protons and electrons. Eventually, the universe cooled down enough for protons and electrons to combine, forming neutral hydrogen atoms.

Then, about 100 million years later, the first stars and galaxies appeared.

These early stars were much bigger and hotter than our sun, and they emitted a lot of energy in the form of ultraviolet light. This light was powerful enough to break apart the hydrogen atoms around them, a process known as ionization.

Reionization continued for hundreds of millions of years, and eventually, most of the hydrogen in the universe was ionized.

Scientists believe this process ended around 1 billion years after the Big Bang, based on current models and evidence like the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), which is the leftover light from the Big Bang, and patterns of hydrogen energy changes, known as the Lyman-alpha Forest.

However, new data from the JWST is causing confusion.

According to a recent study led by Julian Muñoz, an astronomy professor at The University of Texas at Austin, Webb’s observations suggest that reionization could have ended much earlier than previously thought—around 550 to 650 million years after the Big Bang, which is about 350 million years earlier than established models predict.

This early timeline is surprising and doesn’t match other evidence, such as the CMB and Lyman-alpha Forest. This is creating tension between JWST’s findings and long-held theories.

One possible reason for this conflict is that the models we use to study reionization may be missing important details.

For example, there’s a process called recombination, where protons and electrons come back together to form neutral hydrogen atoms.

If recombination happened more often than we currently assume, it would mean that more ultraviolet light was needed to ionize the entire universe than scientists have estimated.

This could explain why the JWST is seeing so many bright, ultraviolet-emitting galaxies.

While the exact reason for this discrepancy is still unclear, astronomers are excited about the future. As Muñoz puts it, “We need more detailed observations of galaxies and a better understanding of recombination to solve this puzzle.”

This study is just the beginning, and further research with the JWST could bring us closer to understanding one of the most important periods in the history of the universe.

Source: University of Texas at Austin.