Every year, thousands of people around the world experience spinal cord injuries that change their lives forever. Many of them lose the ability to move their arms, legs, or both.
This loss of movement is often permanent and deeply affects daily life, independence, and mental health. What makes this condition especially heartbreaking is that, in many cases, the brain and the nerves in the arms and legs are still healthy.
The real problem lies in the spinal cord, which acts like a highway carrying messages between the brain and the rest of the body. When this highway is damaged, the messages cannot get through.
Because repairing a damaged spinal cord is extremely difficult, scientists have begun to explore a different idea. Instead of fixing the spinal cord itself, what if they could find another way to send movement signals from the brain to the body?
This idea has opened the door to new technologies that aim to reconnect the brain and muscles without restoring the spinal cord directly.
A recent study published in APL Bioengineering by researchers from universities in Italy and Switzerland looked at whether a common brain-scanning tool could help achieve this goal. The tool is called electroencephalography, or EEG.
EEG has been used for many years to study brain activity, diagnose epilepsy, and understand sleep disorders. It works by placing small sensors on the scalp to record the brain’s electrical signals. Importantly, EEG does not require surgery, making it much safer than methods that involve implants inside the brain.
The researchers focused on a key observation. When a person with paralysis tries to move a limb, the brain still sends out electrical signals related to that movement, even though the limb does not respond.
These signals are normally blocked at the spinal cord injury. If those signals could be detected, understood, and redirected, they could potentially be used to activate devices that stimulate nerves or muscles below the injury.
In earlier studies, scientists used surgically implanted electrodes to read movement signals directly from the brain. These approaches have shown promise, and in some cases, people were able to move again with the help of stimulation devices.
However, brain surgery carries serious risks, including infection, bleeding, and long-term complications. Because of this, the research team wanted to see if EEG could offer a safer and less invasive alternative.
Using EEG for this purpose is not easy. EEG sensors sit on the outside of the head, which means the signals they capture are weaker and less precise than those recorded by implanted electrodes. Some brain areas are also harder to reach than others.
Movements of the arms and hands are controlled by regions closer to the outer surface of the brain, making them easier to detect with EEG. In contrast, leg and foot movements are controlled by areas deeper in the center of the brain, which makes their signals harder to pick up from the scalp.
To deal with these challenges, the researchers turned to machine learning. They designed a computer program that could analyze complex EEG data and look for patterns linked to movement attempts.
During the study, participants with spinal cord injuries wore EEG caps and were asked to attempt simple movements. Even though their bodies could not move, their brains still produced activity related to the effort.
The machine learning system was trained to tell the difference between moments when a person was trying to move and moments when they were resting. The results were encouraging.
The system was able to reliably detect when a movement attempt was happening. However, it struggled to tell different types of movements apart, such as distinguishing one attempted action from another.
Despite these limitations, the researchers believe the findings are an important step forward. With better algorithms, more data, and improved signal processing, the system may one day recognize specific actions like standing up, walking, or stepping over an obstacle.
The long-term vision is to connect these decoded brain signals to spinal cord stimulators or other devices that can activate muscles below the injury.
Review and analysis of the study show both promise and caution. The strength of this research lies in its focus on safety and accessibility. EEG is widely available, relatively affordable, and does not require surgery.
This makes it far more practical for real-world use than invasive brain implants. The study also confirms that meaningful movement signals remain in the brain even years after spinal cord injury.
At the same time, the technology is not yet ready for everyday clinical use. The difficulty in identifying specific movements highlights the need for further development. Future studies will need larger groups of participants, more advanced machine learning tools, and real-world testing with stimulation devices.
Overall, this research represents an important shift toward noninvasive brain-based therapies for paralysis. While it will not restore movement overnight, it brings science closer to a future where people with spinal cord injuries may regain meaningful control over their bodies without undergoing risky surgery.
If you care about pain, please read studies about vitamin K deficiency linked to hip fractures in old people, and these vitamins could help reduce bone fracture risk.
For more information about wellness, please see recent studies that Krill oil could improve muscle health in older people, and eating yogurt linked to lower frailty in older people.
Copyright © 2025 Knowridge Science Report. All rights reserved.
