Researchers have shown that it’s possible to spy on private conversations using a common robot vacuum cleaner and its built-in Light Detection and Ranging sensor.
The new method, called LidarPhone, repurposes the Light Detection and Ranging (Lidar) sensor that a robot vacuum cleaner normally uses for navigating around a home into a laser-based microphone to eavesdrop on private conversations.
The researchers managed to recover speech data with high accuracy.
“The proliferation of smart devices—including smart speakers and smart security cameras—has increased the avenues for hackers to snoop on our private moments,” says Sriram Sami, a doctoral student working with Jun Han, assistant professor at NUS Computer Science.
“Our method shows it is now possible to gather sensitive data just by using something as innocuous as a household robot vacuum cleaner.
Our work demonstrates the urgent need to find practical solutions to prevent such malicious attacks.”
Listening with lidar
The core of the LidarPhone attack method is the Lidar sensor, a device which fires out an invisible scanning laser, and creates a map of its surroundings.
By reflecting lasers off common objects such as a dustbin or a takeaway bag located near a person’s computer speaker or television soundbar, the attacker could obtain information about the original sound that made the objects’ surfaces vibrate.
Using applied signal processing and deep learning algorithms, speech could be recovered from the audio data, and sensitive information could potentially be obtained.
In their experiments, the researchers used a common robot vacuum cleaner with two sources of sound. One was the voice of a person reading out numbers played from a computer speaker, while the other source was music clips from television shows played through a television soundbar.
The team collected more than 19 hours of recorded audio files and passed them through deep learning algorithms trained to either match human voices or identify musical sequences.
The system could detect the digits being spoken aloud, which could include a victim’s credit card or bank account numbers. Music clips from television shows could potentially disclose the victim’s viewing preferences or political orientation.
The system achieved a classification accuracy rate of 91% when recovering spoken digits, and a 90% accuracy rate when classifying music clips. These results are significantly higher than a random guess of 10%.
The researchers also experimented with common household materials to test how well they reflected the Lidar laser beam and found that the accuracy of audio recovery varied between different materials. The best material for reflecting the laser beam was a glossy polypropylene bag, the worst was glossy cardboard.
Disconnect robot vacuums
To prevent Lidar from being misused, the researchers recommend users consider not connecting their robot vacuum cleaners to the internet.
The team also recommends that Lidar sensor manufacturers incorporate a mechanism that cannot be overridden, to prevent the internal laser from firing when the Lidar is not rotating.
“In the long term, we should consider whether our desire to have increasingly ‘smart’ homes is worth the potential privacy implications.
We might have to accept that each new internet-connected sensing device brought into our homes poses an additional risk to our privacy, and make our choices carefully,” Han says.
The team is working on applying ideas learned from LidarPhone to autonomous vehicles—which also use Lidar sensors—as they could also be used to eavesdrop on conversations happening in nearby cars through minute vibrations of the car windows.
They are also looking at the vulnerability of active laser sensors found on the latest smartphones, which could reveal further privacy issues.
The researchers presented the work at the Association for Computing Machinery’s Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys 2020). Additional coauthors are from the University of Maryland and NUS.
