One of the most important reactions in the universe can get a huge and unexpected boost inside exploding stars known as supernovae, according to new research.
This finding also challenges ideas behind how some of the Earth’s heavy elements are made.
In particular, it upends a theory explaining the planet’s unusually high amounts of some forms, or isotopes, of the elements ruthenium and molybdenum.
“It’s surprising,” says Luke Roberts, an assistant professor at the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams and the physics and astronomy department at Michigan State University. Roberts implemented the computer code that the team used to model the environment inside a supernova.
“We certainly spent a lot of time making sure the results were correct.”
The results show that the innermost regions of supernovae can forge carbon atoms over 10 times faster than previously thought. This carbon creation happens through a reaction known as the triple-alpha process.
“The triple-alpha reaction is, in many ways, the most important reaction. It defines our existence,” says Hendrik Schatz, one of Roberts’s collaborators, a professor in the physics and astronomy department at the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams and the director of the Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics–Center for the Evolution of the Elements (JINA-CEE).
Supernovae and the triple-alpha reaction
Nearly all of the atoms that make up the Earth and everything on it, people included, were forged in the stars.
Fans of the late author and scientist Carl Sagan may remember his famous quote, “We’re all made of star stuff.” Perhaps no star stuff is more important to life on Earth than the carbon made in the cosmos by the triple-alpha process.
The process starts with alpha particles, which are the cores of helium atoms, or nuclei. Each alpha particle is made up of two protons and two neutrons.
In the triple-alpha process, stars fuse together three alpha particles, creating a new particle with six protons and six neutrons.
This is the universe’s most common form of carbon. There are other isotopes made by other nuclear processes, but those make up just over 1% of Earth’s carbon atoms.
Still, fusing three alpha particles together is usually an inefficient process, Roberts says, unless there’s something helping it along.
The researchers revealed that the innermost regions of supernovae can have such helpers floating around: excess protons. Thus, a supernova rich in protons can speed up the triple-alpha reaction.
But accelerating the triple-alpha reaction also puts the brakes on the supernova’s ability to make heavier elements on the periodic table, Roberts says. This is important because scientists have long believed that proton-rich supernovae created Earth’s surprising abundance of certain ruthenium and molybdenum isotopes, which contain closer to 100 protons and neutrons.
“You don’t make those isotopes in other places,” Roberts says.
But based on the new study, you probably don’t make them in proton-rich supernovae, either.
‘Kind of a bummer’
“What I find fascinating is that you now have to come up with another way to explain their existence. They should not be here with this abundance,” Schatz says of the isotopes.
“It’s not easy to come up with alternatives.”
“It’s kind of a bummer in a way,” says the project’s originator, Sam Austin, distinguished professor emeritus at Michigan State and former director of the National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, FRIB’s predecessor.
“We thought we knew it, but we don’t know it well enough.”
There are other ideas out there, the researchers add, but none that nuclear scientists find completely satisfying. Also, no existing theory includes this new discovery yet.
“Whatever comes up next, you have to consider the effects of an accelerated triple-alpha reaction. It’s an interesting puzzle,” Schatz says.
Although the team has no immediate solutions to that puzzle, the researchers say it will impact upcoming experiments at FRIB, which was recently designated as a US Department of Energy Office of Science user facility.
So, although Austin expressed a little disappointment that this result contradicts longstanding notions of element creation, he also knows it will fuel new science and a better understanding of the universe.
“Progress comes when there’s a contradiction,” he says.
“We love progress,” Schatz says. “Even when it’s destroying our favorite theory.”
The research appears in Nature.
