Whether we pick healthy or indulgent foods may depend on what other foods sit nearby on the grocery shelf, new research suggests.
Paradoxically, the nearby presence of an indulgent treat can cause more people to opt for a healthy food, says study coauthor Scott Huettel at Duke University.
Context, in other words, affects food choices.
“When people choose foods, they don’t simply reach into their memory and pick the most-preferred food. Instead, how much we prefer something actually depends on what other options are available,” Huettel says.
“If you see one healthy food and one unhealthy food, most people will choose the indulgent food,” he says. “But if you add more unhealthy foods, it seems, suddenly the healthy food stands out.”
With obesity rates climbing, the authors wanted to examine factors that drive dietary choices.
So they designed a study to look at how viewing indulgent sweet treats such as Snickers and Oreos affected the choice of healthier foods such as salmon or grapefruit.
They invited study participants—79 young adults from the Durham-Chapel Hill area—to fast for four hours beforehand, so they arrived hungry.
First, study participants chose between indulgent foods (tasty but not healthy) and disciplined foods (healthy but not tasty).
When given a simple one-to-one choice, say between canned salmon and Oreo cookies, nearly all subjects preferred the indulgent snack.
But researchers then took the same options and paired each with an indulgent food. For instance, participants saw salmon with Oreos, and Snickers with Oreos.
Participants were told they had a 50 percent chance of getting either item in a pair.
When presented with that choice, participants were twice as likely to choose the pair that included a healthy option, such as salmon and Oreos.
One possible explanation involves attention. The healthy item—salmon, say—was the different item among the choices, so it stood out visually.
Researchers tracked subjects’ eye movements and found that subjects spent more time looking at salmon and other healthy foods when indulgent treats surrounded them.
CHANGING FOOD DESERTS
The results could have implications for the nation’s ongoing battle with obesity.
For instance, in many neighborhoods, healthy food is hard to come by. These “food deserts,” where junk food and fast food abound while fresh produce and healthy protein sources are scarce, cover large areas of the country.
Yet simply adding healthy choices, such as a small produce section to a corner store, typically hasn’t worked, says study coauthor Nicolette Sullivan, a postdoctoral associate in psychology.
The new research suggests part of the problem in that approach may be how food is displayed, she says.
“When people see a wall of cabbage and broccoli, that may not encourage people to choose it,” Sullivan says.
“Right now, food items are very segregated: here’s the produce, here are the candy bars,” she says.
“Yet maybe if we put something healthy in the middle of the snack food section, perhaps that might encourage people to choose it.”
Huettel and Sullivan hope the research can guide new approaches to encouraging healthier diets.
“Individuals struggle with making healthy choices,” Sullivan says. “If we can change the set of foods people are choosing between, people may make healthier choices. And that could have a profound impact.”
The findings appear in the journal Psychological Science.
Written by ALISON JONES-DUKE.
Source: Duke University.