Driverless-vehicle options now include scooters

33
Autonomous Scooter

At MIT’s 2016 Open House last spring, more than 100 visitors took rides on an autonomous mobility scooter in a trial of software designed by researchers from MIT.

The researchers had previously used the same sensor configuration and software in trials of autonomous cars and golf carts, so the new trial completes the demonstration of a comprehensive autonomous mobility system.

A mobility-impaired user could, in principle, use a scooter to get down the hall and through the lobby of an apartment building, take a golf cart across the building’s parking lot, and pick up an autonomous car on the public roads.

The new trial establishes that the researchers’ control algorithms work indoors as well as out. “We were testing them in tighter spaces,” says Scott Pendleton, a graduate student in mechanical engineering at the National University of Singapore (NUS).

“One of the spaces that we tested in was the Infinite Corridor of MIT, which is a very difficult localization problem, being a long corridor without very many distinctive features.”

“You can lose your place along the corridor. But our algorithms proved to work very well in this new environment.”

The researchers’ system includes several layers of software:

Low-level control algorithms that enable a vehicle to respond immediately to changes in its environment, such as a pedestrian darting across its path;

Route-planning algorithms; localization algorithms that the vehicle uses to determine its location on a map; map-building algorithms that it uses to construct the map in the first place;

A scheduling algorithm that allocates fleet resources; and an online booking system that allows users to schedule rides.

Uniformity

Using the same control algorithms for all types of vehicles — scooters, golf carts, and city cars — has several advantages.

One is that it becomes much more practical to perform reliable analyses of the system’s overall performance.

“If you have a uniform system where all the algorithms are the same, the complexity is much lower than if you have a heterogeneous system where each vehicle does something different,” says Daniela Rus, one of the project’s leaders.

“That’s useful for verifying that this multilayer complexity is correct.”

Furthermore, with software uniformity, information that one vehicle acquires can easily be transferred to another.

Before the scooter was shipped to MIT, for instance, it was tested in Singapore, where it used maps that had been created by the autonomous golf cart.

Similarly, in ongoing work the researchers are equipping their vehicles with machine-learning systems, so that interactions with the environment will improve the performance of their navigation and control algorithms.

“Once you have a better driver, you can easily transplant that to another vehicle. That’s the same across different platforms.”

Finally, software uniformity means that the scheduling algorithm has more flexibility in its allocation of system resources.

If an autonomous golf cart isn’t available to take a user across a public park, a scooter could fill in; if a city car isn’t available for a short trip on back roads, a golf cart might be.

Follow Knowridge Science Report on Facebook, Twitter and Flipboard. 


News source: MIT.
Figure legend: This Knowridge.com image is credited to Autonomous Vehicle Team of the SMART Future of Urban Mobility Project.